How Procedures Can Improve Efficiency, available at: https://online.stu.edu/articles/education/autocratic-leadership.aspx (accessed 06 April 2021). To be a great authentic leader, you should accept yourself for who you truly are. But, what is autocratic leadership? A clear chain of command is important in certain environments, like the military. It means employees who are extremely skilled or motivated may begin to lose their incentives to stay active under the current leadership creating conflict in the organisations. Faster decision-making is the key to attaining organizational goals. . That means there is a priority on consistency, with each team member performing their job functions in a similar way. At times, the original instruction may get lost within complex and multiple channels of communication. There is also less feedback from various levels of management which must be processed. Rules are placed for employees to follow in an autocratic leadership style because there is a need to create consistency. Bad leaders can put a company out of business. They make the decision first and then announces it. They just want to come to work, do what theyre told, then go home at the end of the day with a paycheck. Autocratic leaders cant make trust a priority because they are forced to make the rules be the priority. It is an easy way to cut through administrative red tape to ensure better communication to all workers. That means many leaders practicing this leadership style eventually turn into micromanagers, even if that is not their intent. Other relevant articles for you are: Advantages and disadvantages of digital marketing, Advantages and disadvantages of franchising. Definition, Principles, Techniques, and Pros/Cons. He holds an MSc in Tourism & Hospitality from the University of Sunderland. Autocratic leaders rely on specific rules, policies, and procedures to govern all processes within the workplace. These. It can create negative emotions. There are many qualities that are needed to be a good leader or manager. - encourages independence and creativity. It motivates staff by appealing to their personal desires and on instrumental economic transactions. However, there are some advantages of autocratic leadership as well. They consult employees over issues and listen to their feedback or opinions. The idea here is that with a centralised control, giving guidance and direction to employees is relatively easy. These types of interactions do not create a sustainable working relationship, which ultimately creates productivity problems as workers experience lower morale levels. Under autocratic leaders, subordinates would fear due to demands and expectations. Advantages Autocratic style of leadership is very effective in times of emergency or stress since people will always work from orders or commands of their leaders. According to Attner and Plunkett (1994) managers who use the autocratic leadership style do not share decision-making authority with their subordinates. What leads to a successful working relationship is an ability of workers to have trust in their leaders, and vice-versa. They can easily manage these issues because theyre the only ones who get to call the shots. As such, it becomes the right choice for employees who thrive when they are told what to do. In a negative work environment, they also have the power to micromanage, enforce employee dependence, bully and generally mistreat their team. Did you know that autocratic leadership is great when it comes to handling crises? Over time, this makes employee morale begin to sink. As such, between them, there is no communication and you know communication is a must for a healthy relationship. - consultative although the manager will have the final say. Leaders do not concern about whether or not subordinates are satisfied with their actions and instructions. Many companies tend to turn to an autocratic leadership style when they need to create short-term results in an urgent way. It may create an unwelcome culture within the organization. However, this is not feasible for the majority of decisions taken by a business- indeed one of the criticisms of this style is that it can take longer to reach a decision. List of the Advantages of Autocratic Leadership 1. Because of poor coordination, low job satisfaction, low motivation, etc. Due to this behaviour, the leader should yield the ultimate power and provide the employees with the motivation to work, i.e. When there is clear direction, with a path toward success, offered to workers, then they are able to focus on productivity instead of problem solving. Autocratic leaders are in charge and they make this fact known. What makes a good leader or manager? It is one of the best. Autocratic leaders are typically trusted with decisions or important tasks. Productivity levels can see increases with this leadership style. 8. The ultimate democratic system occurs when decisions are made based on the majority view of all workers. Advantages Autocratic style of leadership is very effective in times of emergency or stress since people will always work from orders or commands of their leaders. Low satisfaction also results in below performance than expectations. Both leadership styles are very well known and are often used due to . An autocratic leader is well-equipped to deal with a crisis situation. Provides a clear sense of direction Anyone who's worked on a class group project knows the value of having a leader. 2. We all had, in one job or another, a boss who was feared by everyone. Autocratic leadership is a type of leadership that is individual-centric. Consequence in Leadership Styles, The Disadvantages of Emotional Leadership, Clear separation of leader and subordinate roles, Clearly defined performance expectations for all team members, Consequences for failure to comply with expectations, Specific processes for performing workplace tasks, Strict adherence to established rules and policies, Tom Petty, founder of Tom Petty and the Heartbreakers, Helen Gurley Brown, former editor-in-chief of, Ridley Scott, critically acclaimed filmmaker, Vince Lombardi, former Green Bay Packers coach. But, this lacks in autocratic organizations. Its main weakness is that it hinges heavily on the abilities and temperament of your employees. The Disadvantages of Impulsive Management, Management Styles That Elevate vs. Devalue Employees. Disadvantages. This working environment can leave employees feeling suppressed. Answer (1 of 10): Before I begin, I also tried this type of leadership among newcomers in our Unit. Communication is the systematic process of passing information from one person to another. To conclude, though autocratic leadership style has several disadvantages, it can be argued that there are some situations autocratic leadership style should yield better results for organisations. Because of one-way communication and lack of recognition employees do not get the answers to the questions they deserve. When there are multiple levels of leadership within an organization, a command from the top becomes like a childhood game of Telephone. 214 High Street, Fewer layers of administration and lesser feedback to look into facilitates swift decision-making in the team. They wont get blamed if it fails and they wont get credit if it succeeds. 10. Individual decision making: Less competent sub-managers can be used only to carry out the orders of the boss. More Cautious Check out Harappas, Autocratic Leadership Advantages and Disadvantages. Pros But, in an autocratic environment, there is no employee participation and their concerns are ignored. The biggest problem is, no one talks about innovation and out-of-the-box ideas in this leadership style. Leaders are of different types. Boston House, This requires good two-way communication and often involves democratic discussion groups, which can offer useful suggestions and ideas. If an autocratic leader is put in charge of an inexperienced team, theyll be able to get the job done by outlining specific instructions to follow. Advantages And Disadvantages Of Autocracy: Leadership is a crucial talent that can be applied to any profession or career as the case may be, and there are several leadership styles to choose from. Within autocratic structures, there may not be anyone who has the authority to make a rogue leader accountable to the company to stop their behavior. You must have seen people with varied working styles, ways of talking, and traits. According to IPL.org, autocratic leadership is an extreme form of another kind of workplace leadership known as transactional leadership. Autocratic - quick decision making is guaranteed; Autocratic - good for inexperienced workers; . High clarity on structure and roles Organizations with autocratic leaders usually have very clear lines and borders in between different areas. Put plainly, an autocratic leader is a leader who has total control over their jurisdiction and does not request or accept input from employees regarding their decisions. Autocratic - cause frustration and resentment because the system is so dependent on the leader and because of the non-participation if workers . Instead of there being a democratic process for teams, there are no group positions of leadership with the autocratic style. Key points of Advantages of autocratic leadership Highlights below: It allows for a fast decision to be made. Motivation and reward for leaders Effective where a chain of command is crucial Faster Decision-making Proponents of this government form claim that having one ruler or person to decide on matters concerning a nation and without distractions and influences of others make it easier for the leader to make sound decisions he or she thinks works for the interest of the country. Safety is a top priority within the autocratic leadership style. When a team leaders style can be summarized with my way or the highway, that leader can accurately be called an autocrat. A military leader who cannot make executive decisions can cause a security breach during critical operations, and military personnel who do not receive clear, direct orders from their leaders can become confused and fail to act when necessary. There is no gray area for employee performance in this type of environment, which can be comforting for employees. Likewise, it is also very useful when organisations face constant change or a crisis. SWOT Analysis of Kelloggs (Kellogg Company), https://www.forbes.com/sites/markmurphy/2019/11/24/does-anyone-actually-like-autocratic-leaders-new-data-says-yes/?sh=bd0ef4e10de5, https://hbr.org/2002/10/the-leadership-journey. St. Thomas University: What is Democratic/Participative Leadership? Paternalistic managers give more attention to the social needs and views of their workers. 4. When there is an autocratic leadership established within an organization, there are fewer levels of administration that must be kept informed of each decision. "An organisation is only as good as the person running it". As such, here, every employee is abiding by strict discipline. The cadets were fresh and were eager to learn, my Commanding Officer told me to do the "traditional" way of welcoming the cadets, this in fact is very beneficial to me and us because it instill dis. For employees, an environment where decision-making is solely the managers job can mean a relatively low stress environment. Sources: 9. They must control the consistency at a personal level, which means they can no longer afford to give their team any freedom to operate. in a time of crises). And they are accountable for the outcomes. Workers are less likely to stop their projects or ask for later deadlines because they receive timely decisions and communication from their leadership.
Referendum Apush Significance,
Articles A